18+ legal advertisers delivered an estimated 50M impressions of TV advertising in Alexandria, LA year-to-date. This view measures delivered viewing volume — eyeballs on screen.
Alexandria, LA's legal category delivered an estimated 50M impressions year-to-date across 18+ active advertisers. By impressions, the market is roughly 55% Broadcast / 35% vMVPD / 10% CTV/Streaming.
| # | Firm | Broadcast | vMVPD | Streaming | Total | Split | Streaming % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Majors · 2.0M – 19.3M impressions | |||||||
| 1 | Gordon Mckernan Injury Attorneys | 9.8M | 6.8M | 2.7M | 19.3M | 14% | |
| 2 | Laborde Earles Law Firm | 7.0M | 2.9M | 533K | 10.5M | 5% | |
| 3 | Morris Bart Attorneys At Law | 4.3M | 3.7M | 385K | 8.3M | 5% | |
| 4 | Brian Caubarreaux & Associates | 3.6M | 1.8M | 320K | 5.7M | 6% | |
| 5 | McBride Law Firm | 887K | 1.0M | 105K | 2.0M | 5% | |
| Mid-Pack · 57K – 1.3M impressions | |||||||
| 6 | Hunter & Beck | 799K | 491K | 54K | 1.3M | 4% | |
| 7 | Roy Scott & James Injury Attorneys | 568K | 241K | 26K | 835K | 3% | |
| 8 | The Henry Law Firm | 247K | 203K | 23K | 473K | 5% | |
| 9 | Dudley DeBosier Injury Lawyers | 7K | 149K | 220K | 376K | 58% | |
| 10 | Egenberg Trial Lawyers | — | 8K | 247K | 255K | 97% | |
| 11 | Spurgeon Law Firm | 118K | 50K | 10K | 178K | 5% | |
| 12 | Walker Law Group | 37K | 54K | 6K | 97K | 6% | |
| 13 | Glenn Armentor Law Corporation | 23K | 32K | 25K | 80K | 31% | |
| 14 | Edward J Womac Jr & Associates | 341 | 4K | 72K | 75K | 95% | |
| 15 | William Gee Louisiana Injury Law Firm | 455 | 23K | 33K | 57K | 58% | |
| Challengers · 50K – 56K impressions | |||||||
| 16 | Morris & Dewett Injury Lawyers | — | 2K | 54K | 56K | 97% | |
| 17 | Spencer Calahan Injury Lawyers | 12K | 28K | 16K | 56K | 29% | |
| 18 | Law Offices of Blaine Barrilleaux | 6K | 19K | 25K | 50K | 50% | |
The charts below focus on the top 30 injury-law competitors — the concentrated, material competitive pool within the broader 18+ legal-advertiser market. 50M impressions delivered by those 30 firms year-to-date.
"Other top competitors" represents the 15 firms ranked 16–30 in the competitive pool, each under 3% of top-30 impressions on any publisher shown above.
Each card is one publisher. Top 5 advertisers ranked by SOV on that publisher. Click Show all to expand to every analyzed competitor with measurable impressions.
Active spots running in the Alexandria market this period.
Our platform uses Automatic Content Recognition (ACR) to capture real-time viewing data from the "glass" of over 23 million opted-in U.S. households, across a diverse panel of devices (Vizio, LG) and peripheral inputs. Each captured ad is fingerprinted and matched against a comprehensive ad library to verify when and where it aired.
Each advertiser's activity is split across three mutually exclusive channels.
Publisher definitions
Why vMVPD is its own line. When a viewer watches a local broadcast affiliate through a streaming bundle (YouTube TV, DirecTV Stream, Cox Streaming, Hulu Live, etc.), the delivery is internet-based but the content is broadcast-originated linear. Buyers and sellers treat vMVPD distinctly from both pure broadcast and true OTT — so we report it as a separate line rather than rolling it into either.
Satellite vs. streaming MVPDs. DirecTV satellite dish is reported as Cable. DirecTV Stream (the internet-delivered linear app) is reported as vMVPD.
OTA (Over-the-Air). Free broadcast signals received via antenna from local ABC/NBC/CBS/FOX affiliates. Reported under Broadcast.
A predominantly broadcast-led advertiser will still show single-digit-to-low-teens CTV/Streaming exposure in this view because ACR captures actual viewing across the connected-TV panel — including incidental impressions on Roku, Fire TV, Tubi, Apple TV, Pluto, Peacock, network broadcaster apps, and similar ad-supported streaming platforms. Those carry their own ad inventory distinct from the linear feed (and from vMVPDs), so they're reported under CTV / Streaming.