18+ legal advertisers delivered an estimated 7M impressions of TV advertising in Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-San Luis Obispo, CA year-to-date. This view measures delivered viewing volume — eyeballs on screen.
Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-San Luis Obispo, CA's legal category delivered an estimated 7M impressions year-to-date across 18+ active advertisers. By impressions, the market is roughly 50% Broadcast / 27% vMVPD / 23% CTV/Streaming.
| # | Firm | Broadcast | vMVPD | Streaming | Total | Split | Streaming % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Majors · 241K – 4.3M impressions | |||||||
| 1 | Law Brothers Injury Attorneys | 2.6M | 864K | 815K | 4.3M | 19% | |
| 2 | Los Defensores | 471K | 260K | 98K | 829K | 12% | |
| 3 | Sweet James Accident Attorney | 63K | 181K | 364K | 608K | 60% | |
| 4 | Kirtland & Packard LLP | 82K | 225K | 42K | 348K | 12% | |
| 5 | calljacob.com | 230K | 4K | 6K | 241K | 2% | |
| Mid-Pack · 52K – 183K impressions | |||||||
| 6 | Mario A Juarez Attorney at Law | 10K | 153K | 20K | 183K | 11% | |
| 7 | Pena & Bromberg | — | 6K | 126K | 131K | 96% | |
| 8 | Ayuda Legal | 3K | 120K | 6K | 129K | 4% | |
| 9 | Consumer Law Group | 98K | 14K | 3K | 114K | 2% | |
| 10 | Russ Brown Motorcycle Attorneys | — | 41K | 57K | 99K | 58% | |
| 11 | The Dominguez Firm | 966 | 33K | 44K | 78K | 56% | |
| 12 | The Carlson Law Firm | 62K | 7K | 6K | 74K | 7% | |
| 13 | Amberger & Chamberlain Social Security Law | 63K | 2K | 285 | 65K | 0% | |
| 14 | DK Law Group | — | 21K | 33K | 54K | 61% | |
| 15 | Walkup Personal Injury Law | 3K | 25K | 25K | 52K | 48% | |
| Challengers · 35K – 51K impressions | |||||||
| 16 | Michael B Clayton | 48K | 2K | 2K | 51K | 3% | |
| 17 | Law Offices of J Chrisp | — | 6K | 30K | 36K | 83% | |
| 18 | Curtis Legal Group | — | 22K | 13K | 35K | 37% | |
The charts below focus on the top 18 injury-law competitors — the concentrated, material competitive pool within the broader 18+ legal-advertiser market. 7M impressions delivered by those 18 firms year-to-date.
"Other top competitors" represents the 3 firms ranked 16–18 in the competitive pool, each under 4% of top-18 impressions on any publisher shown above.
Each card is one publisher. Top 5 advertisers ranked by SOV on that publisher. Click Show all to expand to every analyzed competitor with measurable impressions.
Active spots running in the Santa Barbara market this period.
Our platform uses Automatic Content Recognition (ACR) to capture real-time viewing data from the "glass" of over 23 million opted-in U.S. households, across a diverse panel of devices (Vizio, LG) and peripheral inputs. Each captured ad is fingerprinted and matched against a comprehensive ad library to verify when and where it aired.
Each advertiser's activity is split across three mutually exclusive channels.
Publisher definitions
Why vMVPD is its own line. When a viewer watches a local broadcast affiliate through a streaming bundle (YouTube TV, DirecTV Stream, Cox Streaming, Hulu Live, etc.), the delivery is internet-based but the content is broadcast-originated linear. Buyers and sellers treat vMVPD distinctly from both pure broadcast and true OTT — so we report it as a separate line rather than rolling it into either.
Satellite vs. streaming MVPDs. DirecTV satellite dish is reported as Cable. DirecTV Stream (the internet-delivered linear app) is reported as vMVPD.
OTA (Over-the-Air). Free broadcast signals received via antenna from local ABC/NBC/CBS/FOX affiliates. Reported under Broadcast.
A predominantly broadcast-led advertiser will still show single-digit-to-low-teens CTV/Streaming exposure in this view because ACR captures actual viewing across the connected-TV panel — including incidental impressions on Roku, Fire TV, Tubi, Apple TV, Pluto, Peacock, network broadcaster apps, and similar ad-supported streaming platforms. Those carry their own ad inventory distinct from the linear feed (and from vMVPDs), so they're reported under CTV / Streaming.